Wayne State University Matthaei Building - Detroit, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% | |
2 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
3 | LU Yikai | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
3 | LEE Jonah | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
5 | LEUNG Ethan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
6 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 50% | 14% |
7 | TSAO Lukas | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
8 | EDWARDS Maxon | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
9 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 3% |
10 | MAVANI Krishna | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - |
11 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
12 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
13 | MANCINI Ludovica | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
14 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
15 | PAI Lakshan K. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 48% | 15% | |
16 | HAMILTON Brock B. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% | - |
17 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
18 | SLUSHER Gideon | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
19 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
20 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
21 | LEE Ian | 3% | 21% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
22 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
22 | SANTOS Carlos R. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
24 | KUE Temujin | - | 5% | 30% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
25 | VANOYEN Dominick | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
26 | HIRSCH Bobbie A. | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
27 | KERAMANE Halah Z. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
28 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
29 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 2% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
30 | GOGOI Vir K. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
31 | TOWNE Benjamin | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
32 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | HEGDE Riya | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | REAUME Nate | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
35 | BONE Porter | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | HEWES Thomas G. | - | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
37 | STONE Sydney | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | OWENS Carrie M. | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
39 | ZMUDA Aiden | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | COHEN Ava | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
41 | IRVINE Brody | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
42 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
43 | MORSE Katherine | 6% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
44 | GNEUHS Sam | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
45 | TAN Dorathy | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
46 | MICK Gabriel | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
47 | BONGADO Noreen | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
47 | CHABIE Austin | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.