Wayne State University Matthaei Building - Detroit, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | |
| 2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 
| 3 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 
| 3 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 
| 5 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | 
| 6 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 14% | 
| 7 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | 
| 8 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 35% | 10% | 1% | 
| 9 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 3% | 
| 10 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - | 
| 11 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | 
| 12 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | 
| 13 | MANCINI Ludovica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | 
| 14 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 17% | 
| 15 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% | |
| 16 | HAMILTON Brock B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | - | 
| 17 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 7% | 
| 18 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | 
| 20 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | 
| 21 | LEE Ian | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | 
| 22 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | 
| 22 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | 1% | 
| 24 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 15% | 1% | - | 
| 25 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - | 
| 26 | HIRSCH Bobbie A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - | 
| 27 | KERAMANE Halah Z. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - | 
| 28 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 29 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | 
| 30 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 5% | 
| 31 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 32 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | 
| 33 | HEGDE Riya | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 34 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | 
| 35 | BONE Porter | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | HEWES Thomas G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | 
| 37 | STONE Sydney | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 38 | OWENS Carrie M. | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 39 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 76% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 40 | COHEN Ava | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - | 
| 41 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 42 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | 
| 43 | MORSE Katherine | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | - | 
| 44 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | 
| 46 | MICK Gabriel | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 47 | BONGADO Noreen | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | 
| 47 | CHABIE Austin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.