MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | ||
| 2 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 25% | |
| 3 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 3 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 6 | WU MENGKE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 7 | HARRIS Alex K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 8 | GARCIA Ryan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 9 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 10 | PEDERSEN Leif | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 15% | |
| 11 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 12 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 13 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 16 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 19 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 78% | 31% | 4% | - | ||
| 20 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | TORRENTE Jacinto | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | LUO ZIRUI | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 23 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 24% | |
| 24 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 25 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 92% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 22% | |
| 27 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% | ||
| 28 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | OLAODE Stephen | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | XU Michael | 100% | 95% | 63% | 17% | 1% | ||
| 31 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | STEINMETZ John | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
| 35 | HAQ Kamran R. | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 37 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 42 | VAROQUA Tolby | 100% | 95% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | YASAN Anthony | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SUSSMAN Jamie | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ZELAYA Jayson | 100% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | ||
| 48 | HONG Justin | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | RUDNET Noah | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.