AFM Sunnyvale - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 97% | |
| 2 | KANG Anthony J | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% | |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 3 | LAM Nicolas | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - | |
| 5 | WU Alber Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
| 6 | LING Eddie | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 2% | |
| 7 | NGAI Julian | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | LO Preston | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | LOFTUS Luca | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | LIU William | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | YUE Jackson | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | AGRAWAL Niki | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | WU Lucas | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 14 | HUANG Stanley | 14% | 34% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 15 | UHLIG Cole | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | TSAY Jordan R. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 17 | FANG Jaden | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 25% | - | |
| 18 | DULAI Angad | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 19 | TULYAG Azim | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% | |
| 22 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | GORDON William L. | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | SONG Matthew | 29% | 47% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | MORROW Brenden | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | - | |
| 26 | DULAI Agam | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | LI Henry | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 28 | SISINNI Riccardo | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | LI Jonathan | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | LI Richard | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 31 | LU Lucas | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | GOLWALA Yash | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | DURBIN DJ | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | JOHAR Manvik | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | DANIEL Nikith | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | CHUN Dashel | 9% | 38% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | SHA Walter | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.