Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JITTAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
2 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 10% |
3 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 69% |
3 | YOON junhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 25% |
5 | BRUCE Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 42% |
6 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
7 | OH Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 53% | |
8 | PARK Lina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% |
9 | SHAJI Karthik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
10 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 17% | |
11 | DING Tommy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 12% | - |
12 | VOLKOV Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 41% |
13 | BATRA Dev | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 12% | 1% |
14 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% |
15 | WANG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | |
16 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
17 | MITCHELL Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | 1% |
18 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 9% | - |
19 | WEBB Jacob T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | 5% |
19 | MCARTHUR Kemp | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | - |
21 | CAO Kellen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 11% | - |
22 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% | - |
23 | URIBE LEON Sebastian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
24 | OWODIONG-IDEMEKO Ekikeabasi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 8% |
25 | MO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 19% |
26 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
27 | ERBEN Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% | - |
28 | GILLIAM Elijah | 100% | 94% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
29 | HARKINS Asher | 100% | 100% | 86% | 45% | 8% | - | - |
30 | COUSINS Patrick | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - |
31 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 20% | 2% | |
32 | EXNICIOS Rex | 100% | 100% | 81% | 33% | 3% | - | |
33 | MILES Greyson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% | 1% |
34 | WEDDLE Carson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - |
35 | LIU Hangda | 100% | 97% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
36 | TOSCANO Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
37 | MACK Jacob | 100% | 95% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | |
38 | BLACK Elias | 100% | 75% | 10% | - | - | - | |
39 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 60% | 18% | 2% | |
40 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
41 | TAYLOR Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
42 | MORTON Luke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - |
43 | DAVIS Case | 100% | 93% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
44 | CHENG Emma | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | VON KLAR Rhiannon | 100% | 65% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
46 | MOSS Riley | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | |
47 | IQBAL Mariam | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
48 | SARAVANABHAVAN Nila | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
49 | WHITE Kevin | 100% | 99% | 81% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
50 | WANG Kelsey | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
51 | SUN Yuzheng | 100% | 93% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
52 | PARISH Levi | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
53 | BRUCE Naomi | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
54 | ZHAO Bryan | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | LIU Joanna | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
56 | OLSON Clayton M. | 100% | 90% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
57 | JAVATE Ryan | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
58 | TREJO-SALVATIERRA Camila | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | CHEN Mikayla | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
58 | PUTNAM Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 8% | - |
61 | SUGHI Sabrina | 100% | 85% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.