Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XU Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 18% |
2 | CERDA Giovanni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
3 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 69% | |
3 | WANG Max | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
5 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 13% | |
6 | LOGGINS Austin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | |
7 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
8 | RAKAJ Jozef | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | 3% | |
9 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 18% | 1% | |
10 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
11 | GONZALEZ Jerry | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
12 | MEIER Nicholas M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
13 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% | |
14 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 19% | |
15 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
16 | TRUBEY Elise | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
17 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | |
18 | NGUYEN Albert | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | < 1% | - | |
19 | BURGESS Beckham | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 1% | |
20 | JAYARAM Archita | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 12% | 1% | |
21 | ODBADRAKH Batu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 17% | |
22 | XIAO Yao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
23 | RODRIGUEZ Jason | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
24 | HUGHES Eric | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | |
25 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
26 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% | |
27 | CALLAHAN Arrow | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 6% | |
28 | DONDERIS katherine | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | HARKONEN Eemil | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
30 | BALAJI Tejas | 100% | 94% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |
31 | STEWART Brian | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 4% | - | |
32 | PIRRO Anton | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
33 | NGUYEN Andy | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
34 | YUAN Erin | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | 100% | 91% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | |
37 | LIM Kai | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
38 | SULLIVAN Axyl | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | |
39 | STOLL Fuller | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
40 | AVIDANO Mason | 100% | 75% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
41 | CROSS Phoenix | 100% | 63% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | GURKIN Justin | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
43 | VIDRINE Odile | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.