Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
| 2 | LIU Jonathan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 3 | ANDERSON Colton J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
| 6 | LI Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | 6% | |
| 7 | UPTON Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | YI Stephen K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | SEZER Kaya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 10 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
| 11 | RYAN Francis D. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 12 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 6% |
| 13 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 14 | CAMERON Matt W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% | |
| 15 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | NEWHARD Noah A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
| 18 | BERGEN Thomas R. | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 20 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | MILLER Douglas S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 22 | CAHILL Nicholas D. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | CONWAY Brett | 100% | 70% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 26 | LOUNDY Alexander J. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 27 | DECKER Evan M. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ANDERSON David C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | SINHA Verdhaan | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | MALARSKI Daniel | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | DRIVER Samuel | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | REILLY James C. | 100% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 34 | GOODWIN Austin | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.