Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
2 | LIU Jonathan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
3 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
3 | ANDERSON Colton J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
6 | LI Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | 6% | |
7 | UPTON Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
8 | YI Stephen K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
9 | SEZER Kaya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
10 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
11 | RYAN Francis D. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
12 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 6% |
13 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
14 | CAMERON Matt W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% | |
15 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
16 | NEWHARD Noah A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
17 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
18 | BERGEN Thomas R. | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
19 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
20 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
21 | MILLER Douglas S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
22 | CAHILL Nicholas D. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - | |
23 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
24 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
25 | CONWAY Brett | 100% | 70% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
26 | LOUNDY Alexander J. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - |
27 | DECKER Evan M. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | ANDERSON David C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
29 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
30 | SINHA Verdhaan | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
31 | MALARSKI Daniel | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
32 | DRIVER Samuel | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | REILLY James C. | 100% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
34 | GOODWIN Austin | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.