Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% | |
| 2 | CHO Tyler H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 3 | ZUBECK Dominic | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 5 | SCHULTZ Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 6 | SILVERS Noah E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 7 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 8 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 9 | KELSEY Ryan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 10 | WOZNIAK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 11 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | MARTIN Liam N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
| 13 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 14 | MAURER Scott J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 5% | |
| 15 | TOPAZ Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | TANG William | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | BRENNAN Charles F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 21 | SYED Saif M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 22 | LENDER David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 23 | CORRALES Nikolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 25 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | STANLEY Dominick | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | DU Drake | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HONG James | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | OH Matthew M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 29 | ROWE Jason | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | KENT Matthew | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | NICHOLS JR Cortez | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SANCHEZ Bryan | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.