Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 59% |
2 | WANG Mendy | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% | |
3 | CHANG Parker | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
3 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
5 | SIU Max | 1% | 5% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
6 | CAO Joshua | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
7 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
8 | ZHONG Kingsley | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
9 | SHEN Lucas | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
10 | GUGALA Frank | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
11 | HAN Jiaren | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
12 | SONG Enoch | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | |
13 | HUANG Dalynn | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
14 | HU Michael | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | ZHAO David | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
16 | XIA Vincent | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | ZHAI Alex | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
18 | SHOU Raymond | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
19 | WANG Grant | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% | |
20 | SHARMA Ari | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
21 | MARTIRE Francis | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
22 | ROPER Griffin | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
23 | SHUM Wesley | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | SPEZAKIS Achilles | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
25 | QIAN Will | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
26 | SU Aiden | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
27 | MOON Nolan | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | LIN Ziyue | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | SAVIR Ethan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
30 | CAO Aaron | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | CHAE Emmett | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | |
32 | ZUO Yizhi | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
33 | WU Max | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
34 | YANG Luca | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
35 | YUNG Zak | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
36 | FANG Lionel | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
37 | TARDIFF Owen | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
38 | KIM Marcus | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
39 | CAI Charlie | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | LI Andrew | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
41 | LEE Ryan | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | HONG Thomas | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | - | |
43 | CHONG Luke | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
45 | MENZEL Lucas | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.