Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
2 | GONG Joy | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
3 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
3 | KWON Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
5 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
5 | FUNG Iris | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
7 | XU Elaine | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
8 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
9 | ZHAO Selena | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
10 | FOSS Persephone | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% | |
11 | MEYERSON Michelle | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% | |
12 | NIU Jessica | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
13 | GOEL Lineysha | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
14 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
15 | PARK Haylie | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
16 | HUANG Pierra | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
17 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
19 | NANDA Maanika | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
20 | LEE Grace | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
21 | YOUNG Sienna | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | MAK Jayden | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
23 | WEI Madison | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
24 | GOLEN Grace | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
25 | LIANG Claire | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
26 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
27 | KIM Grace | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
28 | ZONG Eliane | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | REN Katherine | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
29 | ZHANG Audrey | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
31 | ZHENG Winona | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
32 | PIENKOWSKI Olivia | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
33 | HILD Anya | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
34 | BANDHU Saahiti | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
35 | LEE Kaitlin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
36 | HARRIS Maya Hué | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
37 | MAGITSKY Giadora | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
38 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
39 | MOFFITT Charlotte | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
40 | WANG Keira | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
41 | JOHN Sophia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
42 | MUNSHI Ridhima | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
43 | PEREIRA Izumi | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | GU Allison | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
45 | CHU Anna | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | MOTOVA Masha | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
47 | NEGROIU Mara | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | SAGER Bianca | 11% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
49 | FONG Zoe | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
50 | CHEN Chloe | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
51 | DANIELS Jordanna | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
52 | STOLCKE Saskia | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
53 | YAP Anna | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
54 | DIBADJ Ava | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
55 | WU Harper | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
56 | ZHANG Nikki | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
57 | BAO Amelia | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
58 | LEE Elise | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
59 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
60 | PASSMAN Caroline | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
61 | PATEL Maia | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
62 | KWAN Kelly | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
63 | KARAVAS Lucy | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
64 | JUN Sofia | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
65 | PARAISO Isabella | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.