Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PERRIER Clement | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 45% | 19% |
| 2 | ROHRLACK Charles (Charlie) F. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 30% | 67% |
| 3 | WILDE Dexter T. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 3 | KULDELL Spencer D. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 5 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 6 | MULVANEY Alec S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 7 | PRIEST Leighton K. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 29% |
| 8 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 9 | SINGER Carson | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 10 | MILLER Levi H. | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 43% | 14% | |
| 11 | CICHOCKI David K. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | YAN Jack P. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 13 | KOKKIN Jack S. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | CUNNINGHAM William | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 15 | RABINKOV Anthony | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 16 | HANEY Vincent | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 17 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | LAI Daniel | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 19 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 20 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 20 | NARANJO David E. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LE Hayden | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | SCHARDINE Ryan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 24 | PARKER Timothy S. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | RESHEIDAT Malik | - | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | MILLER Douglas S. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | ZIRKLE James | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | CHENG Albert | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 31 | KELSEY Bennett L. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | YANG Chenguang | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | FURMAN Thomas G. | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 12% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | CLARK Andrew | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | SCHARDINE James | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GOLD Jackson | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | FORBES Wyatt | 48% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | YANG Ethan | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 12% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Aaron | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.