Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PERRIER Clement | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 19% |
| 2 | ROHRLACK Charles (Charlie) F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% |
| 3 | WILDE Dexter T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 3 | KULDELL Spencer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
| 5 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 6 | MULVANEY Alec S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 7 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% |
| 8 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 9 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 10 | MILLER Levi H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | 14% | |
| 11 | CICHOCKI David K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 12 | YAN Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 13 | KOKKIN Jack S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 14 | CUNNINGHAM William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 16 | HANEY Vincent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 17 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | LAI Daniel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 20 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 20 | NARANJO David E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LE Hayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | SCHARDINE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 24 | PARKER Timothy S. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 100% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | MILLER Douglas S. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | ZIRKLE James | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | CHENG Albert | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 31 | KELSEY Bennett L. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | YANG Chenguang | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | FURMAN Thomas G. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 100% | 88% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | CLARK Andrew | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | SCHARDINE James | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 38 | FORBES Wyatt | 100% | 52% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | YANG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 100% | 88% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.