Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MEHAN Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | WAXLER Ryan | V D V D V | V V V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
3 | GONG zihao | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | BIVIJI Ali | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
5 | SUN Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
6 | SARWAHI Viraat | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
7 | CHENG Sawyer | D D V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
8 | BALE ATMAN | D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
9 | CLARK Aram | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
10 | HENDERSON Lucas | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
11 | SADHU Neiyam | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | GOMEZ Emilio | V V D V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
13 | WONG Max | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
14 | DOMINIQUE Remson | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
15 | KHANNA Adamantis | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
16 | PORTER Dupree | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
17 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
18 | CIEMINS Henry | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
19 | KENNEDY Tomás | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
20 | DE SIENA Salvatore | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | SASSI Ilyas | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
22 | BONETTI Brayden | D V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
23 | LOO Jason | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
24 | LIN Brendan | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
25 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | V D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
26 | SHAH Sohan | V V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
27 | PEREIRA Beckham | V D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
28 | BARENBOYM Michael | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
29 | LAMTAN Christoffer | D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
30 | HU Jayden | V D D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
31 | KOZLOV Lucas | V V D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
32 | WASCO Andrew | D V D D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
33 | YOOK Isaac | V D V V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
34 | LORENZ Evan | V V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
35 | ZHANG Ray | D V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
36 | DAI Zihou | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
37 | SHARMA Colin | V V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | KIARA Kinoti | V D D V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
39 | DEELY Hartigan | V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
40 | AVERY Marcus | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
41 | LEE Damian | V D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
42 | SHINCHUK Jacob | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
43 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | V V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
44 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | D V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
44 | FIROOZI Sam | V D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
46 | GERTSBERG Eli | V D D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
47 | OREN Daniel | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
48 | MIAO Heqi | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
49 | LEVIN Jacob | D D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
50 | DOSTAL Maximilian | D D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
51 | TAYCHER Aaron | D V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
52 | BENNETT Lachlan | D D V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
53 | KARAVAS Nicholas | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
54 | NAYAGAM Nishant | V V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
55 | LUCAS William | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
56 | FADEL alexander | D V V D D D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
56 | WONG Mac | V D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
58 | FORSTED Ian | D D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
59 | MATTOO Dhruv | V D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
60 | HAYTER Henry | D D D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
61 | MAGITSKY Isaac | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
62 | WU Vincent | D D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
63 | SO Morgan | D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
64 | BROOKS Drake | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
65 | REILLY Xavier | D V D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
66 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | V V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
67 | LAU Kyrus | D V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
68 | ZWAKA Jonas | D V V D D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
69 | BIVIJI Adam | D D V D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
70 | CHANG Timothy | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
71 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | D V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
72 | SAYAR Luke | D V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
73 | PATEL Arush | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
74 | KAPOOR Krish | V V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
75 | TUNIK Joshuah | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
75 | BURENKOV Matthew | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
77 | SHAPIRO Simon | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
78 | LIEU Nicholas | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
79 | ZHENG Lucas | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
80 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
81 | LIN Jacob | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
82 | FOUX Jonathan | V D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
83 | HELD Lev | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
84 | EARLEY Jack | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
85 | VISH Manyu | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
86 | HAUSLER Jayden | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
87 | LEE Korbon | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
88 | MENZIES Liam | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
89 | BURG Whit | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
90 | SAUVE Quinn | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
91 | SUH Leo | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
92 | CHEN Kevin | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
93 | MENCIN Thomas | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.