The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

2024 Winter Thrust RYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MEHAN Nicholas - - - - 1% 22% 77%
2 WAXLER Ryan - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
3 GONG zihao - - 2% 15% 43% 39%
3 BIVIJI Ali - - 1% 6% 22% 42% 30%
5 SUN Andrew - 3% 13% 28% 32% 19% 4%
6 SARWAHI Viraat - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
7 CHENG Sawyer 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 2%
8 BALE ATMAN - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
9 CLARK Aram - - - 3% 18% 47% 32%
10 HENDERSON Lucas - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
11 SADHU Neiyam - 1% 5% 18% 33% 31% 12%
12 GOMEZ Emilio 1% 12% 30% 34% 18% 5% -
13 WONG Max 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5%
14 DOMINIQUE Remson - 1% 6% 22% 41% 30%
15 KHANNA Adamantis - - - 3% 18% 48% 31%
16 PORTER Dupree - 4% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2%
17 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 20%
18 CIEMINS Henry - 1% 8% 28% 41% 21%
19 KENNEDY Tomás 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
20 DE SIENA Salvatore - - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10%
21 SASSI Ilyas - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
22 BONETTI Brayden - - - 1% 11% 39% 48%
23 LOO Jason 1% 9% 30% 39% 18% 3%
24 LIN Brendan 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 3%
25 LIEBOWITZ Carson - 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 6%
26 SHAH Sohan - 1% 7% 23% 38% 26% 5%
27 PEREIRA Beckham - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
28 BARENBOYM Michael - 4% 16% 32% 32% 15% 2%
29 LAMTAN Christoffer - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8%
30 HU Jayden 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
31 KOZLOV Lucas - 1% 10% 33% 41% 15%
32 WASCO Andrew 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
33 YOOK Isaac - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
34 LORENZ Evan - 2% 12% 33% 38% 14% 1%
35 ZHANG Ray - 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
36 DAI Zihou - 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7%
37 SHARMA Colin - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
38 KIARA Kinoti - 1% 9% 26% 38% 22% 4%
39 DEELY Hartigan - 1% 10% 29% 39% 20%
40 AVERY Marcus 6% 28% 39% 21% 5% -
41 LEE Damian 30% 42% 21% 5% 1% -
42 SHINCHUK Jacob 3% 21% 39% 28% 8% 1%
43 BELAND Riley James "RJ" - 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
44 LOSQUADRO Joseph 6% 34% 39% 17% 3% - -
44 FIROOZI Sam 22% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
46 GERTSBERG Eli 1% 5% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
47 OREN Daniel 1% 9% 32% 39% 17% 3% -
48 MIAO Heqi - 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 6%
49 LEVIN Jacob - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
50 DOSTAL Maximilian - 4% 20% 39% 31% 6% -
51 TAYCHER Aaron - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
52 BENNETT Lachlan 1% 11% 35% 37% 14% 2% -
53 KARAVAS Nicholas - 7% 26% 38% 23% 5%
54 NAYAGAM Nishant 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
55 LUCAS William 4% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
56 FADEL alexander - - < 1% 5% 28% 57% 10%
56 WONG Mac 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
58 FORSTED Ian 1% 7% 21% 32% 27% 11% 2%
59 MATTOO Dhruv 3% 14% 30% 31% 17% 5% 1%
60 HAYTER Henry 35% 44% 18% 3% - - -
61 MAGITSKY Isaac 9% 31% 36% 19% 4% - -
62 WU Vincent - 3% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
63 SO Morgan 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 4%
64 BROOKS Drake 7% 32% 39% 18% 3% -
65 REILLY Xavier 14% 34% 32% 15% 4% - -
66 SHEYNZON Benjamin 10% 32% 35% 18% 5% 1% -
67 LAU Kyrus 1% 9% 29% 39% 19% 3% -
68 ZWAKA Jonas 10% 31% 35% 18% 5% 1% -
69 BIVIJI Adam 1% 6% 19% 31% 28% 13% 2%
70 CHANG Timothy 4% 24% 40% 25% 6% -
71 O’LOUGHLIN Jacob 21% 40% 29% 9% 1% - -
72 SAYAR Luke 1% 8% 23% 34% 25% 8% 1%
73 PATEL Arush 20% 37% 29% 11% 2% - -
74 KAPOOR Krish 14% 38% 34% 12% 2% - -
75 TUNIK Joshuah 7% 28% 39% 22% 5% - -
75 BURENKOV Matthew 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
77 SHAPIRO Simon 2% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
78 LIEU Nicholas 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
79 ZHENG Lucas 4% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1%
80 HAIRABEDIAN Ellis 49% 39% 11% 1% - -
81 LIN Jacob 14% 39% 33% 12% 2% -
82 FOUX Jonathan 2% 19% 39% 29% 10% 2% -
83 HELD Lev 2% 14% 30% 31% 17% 5% -
84 EARLEY Jack 16% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
85 VISH Manyu 29% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
86 HAUSLER Jayden 9% 29% 36% 20% 6% 1% -
87 LEE Korbon 55% 36% 8% 1% - -
88 MENZIES Liam 42% 41% 14% 2% - -
89 BURG Whit 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
90 SAUVE Quinn 63% 32% 5% - - - -
91 SUH Leo 13% 37% 33% 14% 3% - -
92 CHEN Kevin 22% 48% 25% 5% - - -
93 MENCIN Thomas 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% 1%

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.