Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KULDELL Spencer D. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SINGER Carson | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | MULVANEY Alec S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 5 | RESHEIDAT Malik | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | AURAY Phileas | D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 7 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | MILLER Levi H. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | PRIEST Leighton K. | V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 10 | YAN Jack P. | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | LIU Jonathan M. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | KOKKIN Jack S. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | RABINKOV Anthony | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | HANEY Vincent | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | NARANJO David E. | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | VILLARREAL Mateo | V V D V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 18 | SCHARDINE Ryan | V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 19 | LE Hayden | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 20 | WU Oliver | V V V D D D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 21 | MURZYN III CJ | D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 22 | GOLDBERG Gabriel A. | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 23 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | PARKER Timothy S. | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | GOLD Jackson | V V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | WINEBURNER J.T. | D V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | LAI Daniel | D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 28 | HAM Kevin P. | D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 29 | FURMAN Thomas G. | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | SCHARDINE James | D D D D V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | CHENG Albert | V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | NAGEL Alexander | D D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | MCCLUNG Gavin | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | KELSEY Bennett L. | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 35 | YANG Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 36 | FORBES Wyatt | D D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 37 | RICHER Tyler | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 38 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.