Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KULDELL Spencer D. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SINGER Carson | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | MULVANEY Alec S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 5 | RESHEIDAT Malik | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | AURAY Phileas | D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 7 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | MILLER Levi H. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | PRIEST Leighton K. | V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 10 | YAN Jack P. | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | LIU Jonathan M. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | KOKKIN Jack S. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | RABINKOV Anthony | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | HANEY Vincent | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | NARANJO David E. | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | VILLARREAL Mateo | V V D V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 18 | SCHARDINE Ryan | V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 19 | LE Hayden | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 20 | WU Oliver | V V V D D D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 21 | MURZYN III CJ | D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 22 | GOLDBERG Gabriel A. | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 23 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | PARKER Timothy S. | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | GOLD Jackson | V V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | WINEBURNER J.T. | D V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | LAI Daniel | D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 28 | HAM Kevin P. | D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 29 | FURMAN Thomas G. | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | SCHARDINE James | D D D D V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | CHENG Albert | V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | NAGEL Alexander | D D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | MCCLUNG Gavin | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | KELSEY Bennett L. | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 35 | YANG Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 36 | FORBES Wyatt | D D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 37 | RICHER Tyler | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 38 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.