Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Junior Men's Saber

Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 10:30 AM

Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KULDELL Spencer D. - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
2 SINGER Carson - - 1% 14% 47% 38%
3 VASILYEV Nikita K. - - 6% 28% 46% 20%
3 MULVANEY Alec S. - - - 3% 19% 45% 34%
5 RESHEIDAT Malik - 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 2%
6 AURAY Phileas - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
7 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. - - 2% 15% 43% 41%
8 MILLER Levi H. - - 3% 19% 48% 30%
9 PRIEST Leighton K. - - 2% 16% 45% 37%
10 YAN Jack P. - 1% 11% 35% 41% 13%
11 LIU Jonathan M. - - 4% 19% 39% 32% 7%
12 KOKKIN Jack S. - 1% 6% 26% 41% 23% 4%
13 RABINKOV Anthony - 3% 17% 37% 32% 10% 1%
14 LEFEVRE Colin B. - 1% 9% 30% 39% 19% 2%
15 HANEY Vincent - 4% 29% 44% 20% 3%
16 NARANJO David E. 3% 22% 43% 26% 6% -
17 VILLARREAL Mateo 9% 39% 37% 13% 2% -
18 SCHARDINE Ryan - 2% 15% 38% 36% 9%
19 LE Hayden - 3% 20% 42% 29% 6%
20 WU Oliver - - 2% 14% 36% 36% 12%
21 MURZYN III CJ - 5% 25% 41% 24% 4%
22 GOLDBERG Gabriel A. 19% 47% 28% 6% - -
23 ZHOU Aeres Z. 2% 18% 41% 31% 8% 1%
24 PARKER Timothy S. 3% 21% 44% 27% 5% -
25 GOLD Jackson 1% 12% 37% 35% 13% 2% -
26 WINEBURNER J.T. 14% 40% 35% 10% 1% - -
27 LAI Daniel 1% 10% 34% 41% 13% 1%
28 HAM Kevin P. - 8% 36% 39% 15% 2%
29 FURMAN Thomas G. 13% 44% 34% 9% 1% -
29 SCHARDINE James 52% 39% 9% 1% - -
31 CHENG Albert 26% 54% 18% 2% - -
32 NAGEL Alexander 14% 47% 31% 7% 1% - -
33 MCCLUNG Gavin 39% 44% 15% 2% - -
34 KELSEY Bennett L. 53% 41% 6% - - -
35 YANG Ethan 14% 40% 35% 10% 1% - -
36 FORBES Wyatt 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -
37 RICHER Tyler 59% 34% 6% - - -
38 HU-VAN REETH Alexander 28% 45% 22% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.