Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KULDELL Spencer D. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
2 | SINGER Carson | - | - | 1% | 14% | 47% | 38% | |
3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 20% | |
3 | MULVANEY Alec S. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 34% |
5 | RESHEIDAT Malik | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
6 | AURAY Phileas | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
7 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 41% | |
8 | MILLER Levi H. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 30% | |
9 | PRIEST Leighton K. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
10 | YAN Jack P. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 13% | |
11 | LIU Jonathan M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
12 | KOKKIN Jack S. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
13 | RABINKOV Anthony | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
14 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
15 | HANEY Vincent | - | 4% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | |
16 | NARANJO David E. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | |
17 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
18 | SCHARDINE Ryan | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | |
19 | LE Hayden | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
20 | WU Oliver | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
21 | MURZYN III CJ | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
22 | GOLDBERG Gabriel A. | 19% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
23 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
24 | PARKER Timothy S. | 3% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | |
25 | GOLD Jackson | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
26 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
27 | LAI Daniel | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
28 | HAM Kevin P. | - | 8% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
29 | FURMAN Thomas G. | 13% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
29 | SCHARDINE James | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | CHENG Albert | 26% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
32 | NAGEL Alexander | 14% | 47% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
34 | KELSEY Bennett L. | 53% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
35 | YANG Ethan | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
36 | FORBES Wyatt | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | RICHER Tyler | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
38 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.