Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HONDOR Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 70% | |
2 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | |
3 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | |
3 | DOYON - VERDON William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 33% |
5 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 17% | |
6 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
7 | ZEBROSE Cordell B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% |
8 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
9 | DOELEMAN Zeno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
10 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 21% | |
11 | ZHAO Corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% | |
12 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 13% | |
13 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | 17% | |
14 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | 8% |
15 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | 8% | |
16 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - |
17 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% | 5% |
18 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% |
19 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
20 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | |
21 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 8% | |
22 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
22 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | 3% | |
24 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
25 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 16% | |
26 | GOON Tristan Yang | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | - | |
27 | JIANG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% | |
28 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 98% | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | |
29 | ARMSTRONG Christopher S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | |
30 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
31 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | |
32 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
33 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
34 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
35 | ZHANG Dinghao | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | 1% | |
36 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 89% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | |
37 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 98% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | |
38 | BELLIVEAU Shane | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
39 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 3% | - | |
40 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 81% | 38% | 7% | - | - | |
41 | SONG Changze | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
42 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% |
43 | BAZZANA Beniamino | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
45 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | 100% | 92% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | |
46 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | |
47 | PAGE Duncan | 100% | 94% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | |
48 | EGHIAN Armen | 100% | 96% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | |
49 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
50 | FENG Shang | 100% | 95% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | |
51 | LI Ray | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
52 | LIN Yufei | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
53 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
54 | SEILS Aether | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
55 | BRUEGGEMANN Max | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
56 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 89% | 37% | 5% | - | - | |
57 | THOMPSON Ian | 100% | 93% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
58 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
59 | KOURE Andrew C. | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
59 | ZHANG Wei | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
61 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
62 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.