Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FAUBERT Andy C. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% | |
| 2 | KILUK Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 52% | 23% | |
| 3 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 5 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
| 6 | HAMZA Tudor | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | YANG Boyan | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 37% | 3% | |
| 8 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 29% | |
| 9 | DU SHUNYU K. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 10 | LEE Bryson | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
| 11 | GONZALES Wesley | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 12 | LINDBLOM Ian P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 13 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 14 | LU Jacob | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 15 | KIM Andrew J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 16 | KIM Teo | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | BREILING Niklas | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | BENACK Steven M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 51% | |
| 20 | KNUDSEN Travis | 2% | 16% | 41% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | DAZO Steven (Steve) P. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% | |
| 23 | BENTLEY-INOUYE Evan | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | SPITLER Ansel | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | JOHNSON Ryder | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 27 | MALLON Jaxson | 11% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | HANNON Owen | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 29 | MATHES Caleb | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | GOWDA Suyog | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HINMAN Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 34 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | RIBAUDO David J. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | DANIELS Jonah | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | STOCK Jordan | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | COHEN Joshua | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | VAN SCOYK Aeron I. | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | PAINTER Noah | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ELLINGTON Jeff B. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | OLSON Kevin | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | CHAKRABORTY Zorian | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | ACKLAND Matthew | 26% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.