Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FAUBERT Andy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | |
2 | KILUK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
3 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 23% | |
3 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
5 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% | |
6 | HAMZA Tudor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
7 | YANG Boyan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 3% | |
8 | FRANK Fred | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | |
9 | DU SHUNYU K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
10 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - | |
11 | GONZALES Wesley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
12 | LINDBLOM Ian P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
13 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
14 | LU Jacob | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
15 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
16 | KIM Teo | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
17 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
18 | BREILING Niklas | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | |
19 | BENACK Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 51% | |
20 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | DAZO Steven (Steve) P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
22 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% | |
23 | BENTLEY-INOUYE Evan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | SPITLER Ansel | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
25 | JOHNSON Ryder | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
26 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
27 | MALLON Jaxson | 100% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
28 | HANNON Owen | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | - | |
29 | MATHES Caleb | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
30 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
31 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
32 | GOWDA Suyog | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | HINMAN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | |
34 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | - | |
35 | RIBAUDO David J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
36 | DANIELS Jonah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
37 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
37 | COHEN Joshua | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | VAN SCOYK Aeron I. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
40 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
41 | ELLINGTON Jeff B. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
42 | OLSON Kevin | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | |
43 | CHAKRABORTY Zorian | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
44 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 74% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.