Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MASON Alexander T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
2 | THOMAS Samuel | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
3 | NOWAK Jakub P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
5 | SMOTHERMAN Jason N. | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
6 | COHEN Henry | V V D V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
7 | SERAFYM Damian | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
8 | WILLIAMS Logan | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
9 | AGARWAL Adheesh | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
10 | SWANSON Dave | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
11 | PRIJATEL John R. | V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
12 | KRZYSIAK David F. | D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
13 | STOCK Olivia | D V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
14 | EVERT Todd | V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
15 | MILLER Jackson | V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
16 | FELICIANO Damien | D V V D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
17 | BARFORD Giovanni | V D V V V | D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
18 | HE Lingyun Matthew | V D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
19 | LEHNER Brian | D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
20 | LAUER Michael | D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
21 | CHRISTIAN John R. | V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
22 | GUILFORD Corey | D D V V D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
23 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
24 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | V D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
25 | CRAPNELL Daniel | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
26 | MACNEIL Matthew | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
27 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | D V D D D | V D | 4.3 | 1 | -3.3 |
28 | STAUBITZ Marc | D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
29 | RIPLEY Ian | D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
30 | FULLER II Thomas | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
31 | LUGO Emmanuel | D V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
32 | CHEN Bowen | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
33 | PATEL Aayan | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
34 | LAGONA Anna | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
35 | GILL Anhad | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
36 | MACNEIL Sydney | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
37 | DUTTON Kimberly | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
38 | WELLS Aenea | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
---|---|---|
Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.