Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MASON Alexander T. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
| 2 | THOMAS Samuel | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 3 | NOWAK Jakub P. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 47% | 45% |
| 3 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | - | - | 5% | 30% | 48% | 17% | |
| 5 | SMOTHERMAN Jason N. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 32% |
| 6 | COHEN Henry | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 7 | SERAFYM Damian | - | - | 5% | 25% | 49% | 20% | |
| 8 | WILLIAMS Logan | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | - |
| 9 | AGARWAL Adheesh | - | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 10 | SWANSON Dave | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 42% | |
| 11 | PRIJATEL John R. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 12 | KRZYSIAK David F. | - | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 13 | STOCK Olivia | 1% | 17% | 47% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | EVERT Todd | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 15 | MILLER Jackson | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | FELICIANO Damien | 32% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 17 | BARFORD Giovanni | 2% | 52% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | HE Lingyun Matthew | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 2% | - |
| 19 | LEHNER Brian | 7% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | LAUER Michael | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 21 | CHRISTIAN John R. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 22 | GUILFORD Corey | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 44% | 3% |
| 23 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 5% | |
| 24 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 25 | CRAPNELL Daniel | - | 8% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 27 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | - | < 1% | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | |
| 28 | STAUBITZ Marc | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | RIPLEY Ian | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | FULLER II Thomas | 4% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | LUGO Emmanuel | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | CHEN Bowen | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | PATEL Aayan | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | LAGONA Anna | 16% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | GILL Anhad | 50% | 44% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | MACNEIL Sydney | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | DUTTON Kimberly | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 38 | WELLS Aenea | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.