George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 2 | KIM kihyeon | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | LAM Alan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | WOODLEY Colin | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 5 | RAPALSKI Thomas | V V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 6 | ABBOUD Michael | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | WALLACE George | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | CARTER Austin L. | V V D V D V | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 9 | PETERS Nathan M. | V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 10 | CHEMEZOV Trent | V V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | YOO Dong Hun | V V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | BUI Ryan | V V V V D D | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 13 | PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | MANSKE Niul S. | D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 15 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | V D D D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | SZIEDE Kieran | V D D D D | V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 17 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | CHENH Justin | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | LAM Bill | V V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | ZOOK Evan D. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | HELMINTOLLER Christian | D V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | YU Jason | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | MEGGERS Samuel | V D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | WOODLEY George | D V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 25 | WHITE Myles | D V D D V V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 26 | SEID Zachary W. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | CAMPBELL Paul | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | PENNER Kyle D. | D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 29 | WU Shaochi | D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | SUNKARA Vishnu | V V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 31 | WHITE Zara | V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | WATSON Taylor | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | PETRUNKO Kyrylo | V V V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 34 | TANG Justin | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 35 | STULAK Brendan | V D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 36 | JAROSZ Joshua | D V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 37 | BARTLETT Lauren | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 38 | LEE Aiden | V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 39 | SCHICKEL Juliana | D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 40 | GIAMPETRO Nicholas | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 41 | KEIM Spencer | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | BADLANI Neel | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 43 | DIAZ Brenna | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | GROSCLAUDE-EVANS Antonin | D D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 45 | KELLOFF Michael | D D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 46 | KARASICK Andrew | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 47 | EARLY Isabel | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | LUNDEN Espen | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 49 | HOLM Paul | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | STEVENS Mike | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 51 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 52 | DIX Philip-Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 53 | LUCOT Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.