George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PARCELL Colby | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 2 | MOYD Aaron | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 3 | HUA Catherine W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 3 | XU Michael | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | JENSBY Jason | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | SEMP Brannon A. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | BARBORIAK Emily | V D V D V D | V V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 8 | WEST-BEY Ahmad | D V V D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 9 | HO Alex | D V V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 10 | VLASENKO Bohdan | V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 11 | LEMERY Marc | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | PAGAN Andrew | V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | ROSE Colin | V V V V D D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 14 | MITCHELL Matthew | V V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | ELIAN David | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | SULLIVAN Anna | D D V D D | V V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 17 | CATLETT III Robert | V V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 18 | LEE Thomas | D V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 19 | NGUYEN Anna | D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | RACHAPROLU Divyagnyaan Siddartha | V V V V D D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 21 | GOOTY Shravan | V V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 22 | PIHLSTROM Richie | D D V D V V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 23 | BAIN Tiernan | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 24 | OLMEN Kelsey | V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 25 | CURRY Robin | V D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | CEDENO Andres | D V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 27 | MICHALSKI Brandon | D D D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 28 | SCHICKEL Juliana | V D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | PHAM Matthew | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | PIRAINO Kevin | D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 31 | SMITH ` Tyler M. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | TERRELL Mason | D D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 33 | URIBE David | D D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 34 | PRICE Jesse | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | PETERS Ella | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | HALL Nathan | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 37 | TIONGSON Nicole | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 38 | NESTERUK Hope | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 39 | JIN Adam | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 40 | MYERS Kenneth | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.