George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARCELL Colby | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 2 | MOYD Aaron | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 3 | HUA Catherine W. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 9% |
| 3 | XU Michael | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 5 | JENSBY Jason | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 30% |
| 6 | SEMP Brannon A. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 7 | BARBORIAK Emily | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 8 | WEST-BEY Ahmad | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 9 | HO Alex | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 10 | VLASENKO Bohdan | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 11 | LEMERY Marc | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 48% | 4% | |
| 12 | PAGAN Andrew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 53% | |
| 13 | ROSE Colin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 14 | MITCHELL Matthew | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 15 | ELIAN David | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 16 | SULLIVAN Anna | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | CATLETT III Robert | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 18 | LEE Thomas | - | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 19 | NGUYEN Anna | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 29% | 5% | |
| 20 | RACHAPROLU Divyagnyaan Siddartha | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% |
| 21 | GOOTY Shravan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | PIHLSTROM Richie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 23 | BAIN Tiernan | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 24 | OLMEN Kelsey | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CURRY Robin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | CEDENO Andres | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | MICHALSKI Brandon | 26% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SCHICKEL Juliana | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | PHAM Matthew | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | PIRAINO Kevin | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | SMITH ` Tyler M. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | TERRELL Mason | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | URIBE David | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PRICE Jesse | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | PETERS Ella | 47% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | HALL Nathan | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TIONGSON Nicole | 7% | 36% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | NESTERUK Hope | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | JIN Adam | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MYERS Kenneth | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.