University of Alabama Student Recreation Center - Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | GORDON Reis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 2 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 3 | WEBB Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 3 | SOPER Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 5 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 29% |
| 6 | PAYNE Gareth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 7 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 8 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | TUCKER Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 10 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 11 | CALINSKY Edward | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 12 | KERTESZ Stefan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | FORD Tillman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 1% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Eli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | DUNKLIN Devon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | DONG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 17 | RAY William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
| 18 | LEE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 19 | CRAIG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 20 | PARCELEWICZ John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 21 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | ZIELINSKI Alexander | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | MACGREGOR Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 24 | TURK Reggie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | BROWN Hannah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | SEATON Jake | 100% | 100% | 91% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | KEMLE Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | KNOX Aidan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | TEGERT Emma | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | JOHNSON Grady | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 32 | JOHNSTON Jacob | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | BROWN Matt | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 35 | BARRON Grayson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 8% | |
| 36 | SIMPSON John | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | OGLE Bennett | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | WILLIAMS Joe | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | GAYFORD Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | ARNOLD Samuel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | NIST Carter | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | STUESSY Nolan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | CARRUTH Mae | 100% | 77% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | BACARISSE Nicholas | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | HAUSER Samuel | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | WENTWORTH Ashley | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | PARKER Jordan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | BARRETT John | 100% | 65% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | BENJAMIN John | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | BRELAND craig | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 51 | FULLER Patrick | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | STEELE Alexis | 100% | 79% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.