Kay Baily Hutchison Convention Center Hall C - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 2 | GRIFFIN John O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 3 | RUFFNER Blake W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 3 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 5 | LEWIS Paul D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 6 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 7 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 6% |
| 8 | GARCIA-MONTES Emilio | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 9 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
| 10 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 8% |
| 11 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 12 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 7% |
| 13 | KIM Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 14 | CHEZ Nolan | 100% | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 15 | KIM Andy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 16 | ANDRIC Borna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% | 1% |
| 17 | THAYER Jake T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | |
| 18 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | |
| 19 | MARÍN MANRÍQUEZ Ángel Fernando | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 7% | |
| 20 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | LONG Quinton R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 9% |
| 22 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% |
| 23 | JOHNSON Chance | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 43% | |
| 25 | QUINONES Diego A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 7% |
| 26 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 27 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ACUNA Gabriel G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | |
| 29 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 30 | STANTON Timothy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 31 | GARCIA-MONTES Dario | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 32 | DAI Christopher | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 33 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 47% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | WARMERDAM Joseph | 100% | 43% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 37 | FLYNT Hayden | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | GIDDENS James | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHEN Kelton | 100% | 93% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 43 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | KUZMAK Michael J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | WEST Abraham | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | HEMENG Oppong M. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | MCCOY Camden | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | COWARD Daniel | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | SENISCH Isaac | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 70% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | MILLER Wayland | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | NUCKLES Caden | 100% | 78% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | GODFREY Christopher | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.