Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 2 | GUILFORD Corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 9% |
| 3 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
| 3 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 32% |
| 5 | MBERIA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 6 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 93% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 7 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
| 8 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | 7% |
| 9 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 10 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 11 | STOKELL Parker | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | BRETHAUER Adah | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 13 | VAN DYK Mark | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 100% | 91% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | REEN Stephen | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | SABOL Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 17 | MACNEIL Sydney | 100% | 97% | 68% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | HENDERSON Emery | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 19 | HETRICK Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | DUTTON Kimberly | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.