Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 2 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 3 | SCOTT Eve | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 3 | NATH Trisha | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 5 | LUKER Sophia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 5 | ZENG Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | SPEARS Mya B | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 8 | DAI Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | HASSAN Aziza R. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 11 | KHAN Alissa | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 12 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 13 | HUANG Doris | - | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 15 | COLTER Aurora | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 16 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | VINOKUR Anita | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | WANG Elysia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 19 | LIU Yifei | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 20 | LIU Kelly | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 21 | GENTILE Vittoria | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | ZHENG Valentina | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CHAVAN Arya | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 25 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | FAN Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 27 | MCGRAW Sadie | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DAMBAL Sasha | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 31 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | NAYAK Esha | 12% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | BARROSO Isabela | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BUSH Bethany | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | BROWN Aria | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | NEUMAN Ella | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | KIM Audrey | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | CHI Claire | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | ONG Lauren | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | NAYAK Antara | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | MYAT Chloe | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CROOKS Riley | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ZHANG Sophie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 44 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | KANDADAI Lara | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | TENG EMMA | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | PROBASCO Leila | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | TU Sadie | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | MACKAY Katherine | 5% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | KHOST Maeve | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | DEMING Clare L. | < 1% | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
| 54 | GETZONI Mary | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.