University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 2 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 3 | LUC Linkin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | |
| 3 | VO Blake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 5 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 17% | |
| 6 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | |
| 7 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 8 | VAN ROY Ray | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 4% | |
| 9 | XIE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 10 | HO Alden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 4% | |
| 11 | WESTMORELAND-BROWN Cole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 12 | YUE Ivan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 13 | DECHEV Vlad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 14 | CAO Chuck | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
| 15 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | CHAN Troy | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | CHANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | 曾 ZIMO | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 19 | WU Dawei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | 6% | |
| 20 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | ESTEVES Andres | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | ORLINO Sam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | NGUYEN Drake | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 24 | JI Derek | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | MALLARD Arthur | 100% | 90% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | SCHILLA Max | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | XU Ethan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | WANG James | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | TAN Daniel | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | YU Albert | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 97% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | IRVINE Cooper | 100% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | YU Joshua | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 36 | GUAN Dylan | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.