University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 3 | HOM Avery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 3 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 5 | MA Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 28% |
| 6 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 7 | HSU Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 50% |
| 8 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
| 9 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 10 | ARYA Leela | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 11 | CHO Karis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 12 | THOTA Akira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 13 | PAN Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
| 14 | JENA Aanvi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHANG Queeny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 16 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 17 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LIN Avery | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | CHU Lauren | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | IRELAND Moira | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | KO Adeline | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | STERNAD Pia | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | YU Xintong | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 25 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | TANG Amelia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | HO Chloe | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 28 | YU-TAN Claire | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HOM Emma | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | THERIOT Reagan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOFFMAN Isabelle | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BHANGOO Paloma | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | DONG Nancy | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 100% | 89% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | PRAKASH Rhea | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LIU Madeleine | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SCHUETZENMEISTER Elena | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 41 | PARK Gian | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.