The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

10 Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Senior Mixed Épée

Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 10:00 AM

Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TRAVAGLINO Stefano 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 16%
2 SWENSON Keane J. 100% 100% 91% 61% 23% 3%
3 VERNACHIO Anthony 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
3 DANZIG Jacob S. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 41% 8%
5 CAI Brian 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 9%
6 ARIAS Troy A. 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 15%
7 BENDER Rhys T. 100% 91% 61% 25% 5% -
8 FLOYD Sean C. 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 7%
9 ELLINGTON Keegan A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 48%
11 BLAND Ian A. 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
12 RAMCHARAN Zachary K. 100% 100% 96% 74% 34% 6%
13 MALLOY Patrick G. 100% 100% 99% 90% 55% 13%
14 YIM Nathan H. 100% 100% 91% 64% 27% 5%
15 KIM Alexander 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
16 WAGNER Lyndsay K. 100% 99% 94% 77% 47% 18% 3%
17 JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 16%
18 HAN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 11%
19 AWAN Saqlain A. 100% 98% 87% 59% 27% 6% 1%
20 LIU Darren 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3%
21 BEACH Nicholas 100% 100% 97% 77% 37% 7%
22 TINSLEY Cole 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 4%
23 WALKER IV Weymouth D. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 20%
24 PANTALONE Giuseppe A. 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 21%
25 JAAFAR Youssef 100% 96% 79% 46% 17% 3% -
26 LEA Russell J. 100% 100% 96% 82% 53% 21% 4%
27 SINGH Arnav 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 10%
28 MCGRATH Russell D. 100% 98% 83% 50% 16% 2%
29 CUNNINGHAM Jr. John P. 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
30 PARAMESH Dhilan R. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
31 YANG Justin T. 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
32 EDWARDS Darby 100% 99% 76% 28% 4% -
33 SAYLOR David A. 100% 97% 78% 41% 11% 1%
34 PARCELEWICZ John M. 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 14%
36 DULISSE Alex 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 13% 2%
37 JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. 100% 99% 91% 70% 38% 13% 2%
38 KERTESZ Stefan 100% 100% 98% 87% 61% 27% 6%
39 MCAREAVEY James 100% 99% 85% 53% 18% 2%
40 HEINZE Luke H. 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 8%
41 LANGE Eric A. 100% 99% 92% 60% 17% 2%
42 CRISTIAN Ana 100% 93% 66% 27% 5% -
43 JAAFAR Adam 100% 95% 64% 24% 4% -
44 GUNDUBOGULA Raj 100% 95% 72% 35% 8% 1%
45 COPELAND Raymond 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3% -
46 NG Joshua Z. 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 21% 4%
47 PROCTER Jonathan R. 100% 98% 88% 63% 30% 8% 1%
48 ATON Dave 100% 99% 89% 63% 29% 7% 1%
49 WEBB Jacob T. 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 17% 2%
50 VALES Keyan 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 3%
51 MERRIMAN Morgan 100% 93% 69% 34% 9% 1%
53 CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. 100% 99% 88% 57% 19% 2%
54 JORDAN Jonathan ". 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1%
56 ZIMINSKY Karel M. 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 5% -
57 DREITZLER Nicholas 100% 100% 92% 68% 34% 9% 1%
58 BOBERTZ Hogan 100% 100% 95% 73% 35% 8% 1%
59 LIU Edward 100% 97% 81% 51% 20% 5% -
60 AMMON Blue 100% 94% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
61 JAAFAR Omar 100% 99% 86% 49% 15% 2% -
62 LEE Kennith 100% 66% 9% - - -
63 COOPER Judson 100% 95% 68% 28% 5% -
64 SUN Kevin 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% -
65 CHRONISTER Charles 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 7% 1%
66 WAKEFIELD Rachel 100% 96% 79% 48% 18% 4% -
67 SHAH Anuj 100% 88% 52% 16% 2% -
68 WILSON Ashley 100% 87% 52% 17% 3% -
69 MCCONNELL Leslie 100% 90% 59% 23% 4% -
70 CUADRA Oscar 100% 97% 78% 40% 10% 1%
71 MERMIGKAS John 100% 98% 81% 44% 13% 2% -
72 PRICE Ethan 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
73 RICKMAN II Samuel B. 100% 80% 40% 11% 2% - -
74 KOMORNIK Michael 100% 92% 63% 25% 5% -
74 GARTNER Kara 100% 87% 52% 16% 2% -
76 KOKA Ashwin 100% 96% 73% 37% 10% 1%
77 CHUMNEY Ben 100% 72% 27% 4% - - -
79 PRICE Makalyn W. 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
82 TO Hang Minh 100% 90% 60% 26% 7% 1% -
82 GARTNER Kacie 100% 94% 70% 35% 10% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.