Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TRAVAGLINO Stefano | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
2 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
3 | VERNACHIO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
3 | DANZIG Jacob S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
5 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
6 | ARIAS Troy A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
7 | BENDER Rhys T. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
8 | FLOYD Sean C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
9 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | |
11 | BLAND Ian A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
12 | RAMCHARAN Zachary K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
13 | MALLOY Patrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 13% | |
14 | YIM Nathan H. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
15 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
16 | WAGNER Lyndsay K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 47% | 18% | 3% |
17 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
18 | HAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
19 | AWAN Saqlain A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
20 | LIU Darren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
21 | BEACH Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
22 | TINSLEY Cole | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
23 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
24 | PANTALONE Giuseppe A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
25 | JAAFAR Youssef | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | LEA Russell J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
27 | SINGH Arnav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
28 | MCGRATH Russell D. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
29 | CUNNINGHAM Jr. John P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
30 | PARAMESH Dhilan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
31 | YANG Justin T. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
32 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 99% | 76% | 28% | 4% | - | |
33 | SAYLOR David A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
36 | DULISSE Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
37 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 38% | 13% | 2% |
38 | KERTESZ Stefan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
39 | MCAREAVEY James | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
40 | HEINZE Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
41 | LANGE Eric A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 17% | 2% | |
42 | CRISTIAN Ana | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
43 | JAAFAR Adam | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
44 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
45 | COPELAND Raymond | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
46 | NG Joshua Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
47 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
48 | ATON Dave | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
49 | WEBB Jacob T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
50 | VALES Keyan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
51 | MERRIMAN Morgan | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
53 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
54 | JORDAN Jonathan ". | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
56 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
57 | DREITZLER Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
58 | BOBERTZ Hogan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
59 | LIU Edward | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
60 | AMMON Blue | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
61 | JAAFAR Omar | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
62 | LEE Kennith | 100% | 66% | 9% | - | - | - | |
63 | COOPER Judson | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
64 | SUN Kevin | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
65 | CHRONISTER Charles | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
66 | WAKEFIELD Rachel | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
67 | SHAH Anuj | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
68 | WILSON Ashley | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
69 | MCCONNELL Leslie | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
70 | CUADRA Oscar | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
71 | MERMIGKAS John | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
72 | PRICE Ethan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
73 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
74 | KOMORNIK Michael | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
74 | GARTNER Kara | 100% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
76 | KOKA Ashwin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
77 | CHUMNEY Ben | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
79 | PRICE Makalyn W. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
82 | TO Hang Minh | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
82 | GARTNER Kacie | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.