Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QURESHI Afzal (AJ) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
| 2 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | ||
| 3 | HOOKASSIAN Austin N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 5 | IZENSON William (Will) P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 6 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | JACOB Bret | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 8 | SCHUTZ Katherine G. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | LOGGINS Austin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 10 | JARDIM Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 11 | MENKE Kavya I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 12 | RAULS Jackson V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 9% |
| 13 | MCGOWEN Collin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 31% | 4% | |
| 15 | FANG Zhou | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 16 | LENTHART Robert (Ian) I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | PINEDA Gabriel U. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 19% |
| 18 | RICH Jack | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 19 | JUTRAS Daniel G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 21 | WHEAT Ryun B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ARDOIN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 23 | SON Daniel J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 24 | WALLACE Cade | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 25 | NORTON Stephen | 100% | 91% | 52% | 14% | 1% | ||
| 27 | SU Thalia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 28 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 30 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 31 | RICHERSON James | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | BOND Christopher D. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 34 | ROBINSON Wesley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 37 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | FOGARTY Katie | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 39 | JOHNSON Julia F. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | VO Khanh D. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SEGARD Ian | 100% | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | WOOD Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 43 | LIU Iris | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 44 | GIRARD Parker | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | HE Cassandra | 100% | 91% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | CREVELING Kathryn | 100% | 82% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER Matthew | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 49 | YU Johnathan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WEST Matthew S. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WATKINS Christopher M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HOPKINS William | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | BOWE Trey | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.