Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Hanru | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 2 | TANG Royce | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 3 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 10% |
| 3 | NABASSOUA Djibril | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 5 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 64% |
| 6 | REN Ryan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 7 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 8 | GATES Combustion | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | BAI Austin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 10 | WANG Ancen | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 11 | SAMUEL Lucas | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 12 | LEE Thomas | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 13 | YAVENDITTI William | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 14 | WU Wallace | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 15 | KIM Daniel | 4% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 16 | AHMAD Uzayr | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 4% |
| 17 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 18 | CHOI Hunter | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | JIN Andy | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 20 | HUANG Jinyao | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 21 | OH Joshua | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | HU Daniel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | ULYSSE Jacob | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | LIU Ryan | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | MA Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | SHAW eric | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 27 | ZHANG Ethan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 28 | JIANG Bohan | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 29 | HOU Gaven | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 30 | WU Alexander | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 32 | SHEN Lucas | 1% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHENG Austin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | XIA Vincent | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | KAYE Ben | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | BEYDOUN Sam | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | LEE Kyle | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | XIA Philip | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | WANG Luke | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 40 | HU Michael | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 41 | DAWSON Myer | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | YOUM Tyson | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 43 | SHARMA Ari | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | LIN Qianzhong | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | TIAN Dylan | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHONG Kingsley | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 48 | CAO Joshua | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 49 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 50 | ZHAO David | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 51 | TANG Michael | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 52 | DAVIDSON Henry | 20% | 48% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | YANG David H. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | JABLOKOV Roman | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | BU Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 56 | SPERBER Miles | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 57 | HUANG Marcus | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 59 | RAJAT Rivaan | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GUGALA Frank | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 61 | CHONG Cooper | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | WANG Joshua | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Aeden | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SONG Enoch | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 65 | MARTIN Ahmir | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | LIU jeremy | 1% | 15% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LIU Brady | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | SOSKIN NOAH | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 69 | WANG George | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 70 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | CONNELLY Malcolm | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 72 | SHOU Raymond | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 73 | LI Andrew | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | TIAN Andy | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 75 | NAYAK Saideep | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | WEZWICK Luke | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 78 | BHOSREKAR Som | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | PANG Owen | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 80 | DUDDA Kavin | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 81 | DAVE Neil | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.