Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SONG Noel | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 2 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 3 | LIU Derek | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% | |
| 3 | KAPOOR Aayan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 5 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 6 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 30% | |
| 6 | WU Trevor | - | - | - | 7% | 50% | 43% | |
| 8 | FENG Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 9 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 9 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% | |
| 11 | LEE Eugene | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 12 | BAI Brian | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 11% |
| 13 | CHEN Hanson | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | |
| 14 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 20% | |
| 15 | SHAO Eric | - | - | 3% | 21% | 49% | 27% | |
| 16 | LI Allen | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 18 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | - | - | 7% | 50% | 43% | |
| 19 | JIN Andy | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 20 | SHENG Dalton | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 21 | TOOMRE Kai | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | ZHANG GAVIN J | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 23 | BAKSHI Aman | - | 11% | 38% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | JIANG Bowang | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 39% | |
| 25 | LEE Charles T | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | ZHAO Ryan | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KO Caleb | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 28 | BAI Austin | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | DIAZ Gabriel | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | SICAT Justin | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | XIE Jicheng | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | LINDEMANN Marc | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | MARTIN Mason | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | CHO Xzander | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
| 35 | HOLMES Alexiy | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
| 37 | GAO Andrew | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 38 | QIAN Zekai | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BELOKON Sammy | 1% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | DHOTE Meetansh | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MO Ethan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHUN Zachary | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | FROST Chayse | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 45 | SHAW eric | 1% | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 46 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 3% | 21% | 43% | 30% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | CHEN kenneth | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | COSSROW Alex | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | POLLIO Benjamin | 35% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | ARENBERG Owen | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | LIANG Haojia | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | WIDOFF-WOODSON Jackson Leroi | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | BARBANEL Joseph | 4% | 39% | 41% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | CHA James | 6% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | BRAWN Gavin | 9% | 42% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | CROWE Adam D. | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | ONIK Ari N. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | HOLLIS Sean | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 59 | BEGIN Nathan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 60 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | HWANG Jacob | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | WANG Luke | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | CHUN Alexander | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.