Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
2 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
3 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
3 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
5 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
6 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% | |
6 | WU Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 43% | |
8 | FENG Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
9 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% | |
9 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
11 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
12 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 11% |
13 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
14 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 20% | |
15 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 27% | |
16 | LI Allen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
17 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
18 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 43% | |
19 | JIN Andy | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
20 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
21 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
23 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 88% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
24 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 39% | |
25 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - |
26 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | KO Caleb | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | BAI Austin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
30 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
30 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
32 | LINDEMANN Marc | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
33 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
34 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
35 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
36 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% | |
37 | GAO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - |
38 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
39 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | DHOTE Meetansh | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
41 | MO Ethan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
42 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | FROST Chayse | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
44 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
45 | SHAW eric | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - |
46 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 3% | - | |
47 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
48 | COSSROW Alex | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
49 | POLLIO Benjamin | 100% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
50 | ARENBERG Owen | 100% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
51 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
52 | WIDOFF-WOODSON Jackson Leroi | 100% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
53 | BARBANEL Joseph | 100% | 96% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | |
54 | CHA James | 100% | 94% | 64% | 21% | 2% | - | |
55 | BRAWN Gavin | 100% | 91% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
56 | CROWE Adam D. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
57 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
58 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
59 | BEGIN Nathan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
60 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
61 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
62 | WANG Luke | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
63 | CHUN Alexander | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.