UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Savannah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
2 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
3 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
3 | CHANG Olivia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
5 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 30% | |
6 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 25% | |
7 | LIU Ariana | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% | |
8 | KNAPP Isabella | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
9 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
10 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 34% |
11 | WU Maggie Lei | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
12 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
13 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
14 | NWODO Naila | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
15 | DONG Iris | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 37% | |
16 | HOM Avery | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
17 | WATSON Evelyn | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
18 | LUO Amira | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
19 | YIN Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
19 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
21 | ZHAO Olivia | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
22 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
23 | ZHOU Joi | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
24 | BOIKE Lucille | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
25 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
26 | CHEN Yinuo | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
27 | TAO Isabella | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
28 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% | |
29 | ESMONDE-WHITE Daphne | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
30 | KOU Elisha | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% |
31 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
32 | SAMALA Reese | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
33 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
34 | MARTIN Sloan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
35 | KIM Gia | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | HU Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
37 | MA Sophia | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
38 | CHAN Hailey | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | RIVERA Leahy | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
40 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
41 | SUN Nicole | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
42 | HOM Emma | 18% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
43 | LEO Jenna | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
44 | ZHANG Caroline | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | YANG Olivia | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
46 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
47 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
48 | HUANG Natalie | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
49 | XU Charlene | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
50 | KUANG Xiyan | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
51 | KIM Audrey | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | |
52 | ZHANG Selina | 2% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
53 | LEE Eun-Hae | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
54 | CHOI Evelyn | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
55 | HUFFMAN Yunia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
56 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
57 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
57 | SHI Micah | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
59 | LU Miaotian | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
60 | KAGAN Natalie | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | LIU Sophia | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
62 | ZHOU Jolena | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
63 | LIN Athena | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
64 | KASHUBA Mila | 19% | 51% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
65 | LYNCH Kathryn | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
66 | CULLIVAN Elise | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
67 | LIN Claire | 36% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | CHAVEZ Beatrix | 16% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
69 | KU Amanda | 10% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
70 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | KIM Yuna | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
72 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
73 | EVOLA Samantha | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
74 | SAVIOZ Naomi | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
74 | WELTER Gemma | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | YU Reecy | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
77 | BELL Blake | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
78 | HUANG Cynthia | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | THURSTON Gemma | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
80 | JIMÉNEZ PELAY Claudia | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
81 | LEIBERMAN Talia | 32% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
82 | FAROOQI Eliora | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
83 | LIN Megan | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
84 | MADABHUSHI Diya | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
85 | GARRISON Emersyn | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
86 | GONG Maggie | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.