UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
2 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
3 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
3 | CHANG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
5 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% | |
6 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% | |
7 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% | |
8 | KNAPP Isabella | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
9 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
10 | KRAHE Annika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
11 | WU Maggie Lei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
12 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
13 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
14 | NWODO Naila | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
15 | DONG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 37% | |
16 | HOM Avery | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
17 | WATSON Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
18 | LUO Amira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
19 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
19 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
21 | ZHAO Olivia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
22 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
23 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
24 | BOIKE Lucille | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
25 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
26 | CHEN Yinuo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
27 | TAO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
28 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
29 | ESMONDE-WHITE Daphne | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
30 | KOU Elisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
31 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% | 1% | |
32 | SAMALA Reese | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
33 | ZEE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
34 | MARTIN Sloan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 23% |
35 | KIM Gia | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
36 | HU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
37 | MA Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
38 | CHAN Hailey | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | RIVERA Leahy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
40 | ZHANG Priscilla | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
41 | SUN Nicole | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | HOM Emma | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
43 | LEO Jenna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
44 | ZHANG Caroline | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | YANG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
46 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
47 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
48 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
49 | XU Charlene | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
50 | KUANG Xiyan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
51 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 95% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
52 | ZHANG Selina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
53 | LEE Eun-Hae | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
54 | CHOI Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
55 | HUFFMAN Yunia | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
56 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
57 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
57 | SHI Micah | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
59 | LU Miaotian | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
60 | KAGAN Natalie | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
61 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
62 | ZHOU Jolena | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
63 | LIN Athena | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
64 | KASHUBA Mila | 100% | 81% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
65 | LYNCH Kathryn | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
66 | CULLIVAN Elise | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
67 | LIN Claire | 100% | 64% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | CHAVEZ Beatrix | 100% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
69 | KU Amanda | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
70 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | KIM Yuna | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
72 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
73 | EVOLA Samantha | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
74 | SAVIOZ Naomi | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
74 | WELTER Gemma | 100% | 94% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
76 | YU Reecy | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
77 | BELL Blake | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
78 | HUANG Cynthia | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | THURSTON Gemma | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
80 | JIMÉNEZ PELAY Claudia | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
81 | LEIBERMAN Talia | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
82 | FAROOQI Eliora | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
83 | LIN Megan | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
84 | MADABHUSHI Diya | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
85 | GARRISON Emersyn | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
86 | GONG Maggie | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.