Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 2 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 3 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 5 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 44% |
| 5 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 7 | YOON Junhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
| 8 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 9 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 10 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 11 | BOESKIN Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 12 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 13 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 19% |
| 14 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
| 16 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 18 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 11% |
| 20 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 23 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 23 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 26 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 27 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 29 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 30 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | BARRERA Marcelo | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | YOU Chanmin | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | CHIANG Aiden | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | ROBERTSON Liam | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | GRIGORYAN Erik | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | CAO Kellen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LI Jayden | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | REBNER Parker | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MARTIN Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 47 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 86% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | SIGGINS Wally | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CHIU Vincent | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LEE Junehyuk | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | SU Daniel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | PFRENGER Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 53 | KARLEKAR Ved | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | DRAKE Davis | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 55 | MARTIN Julian | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 56 | PATEL Aarav | 100% | 98% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.