UMN RecWell North Gym - Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Jerry | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 2 | ZHENG Andy | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% | |
| 3 | VEZMAR Evan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 3 | ROWLAND Marsden | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | AGARWAL Adheesh | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 5 | TAKATA Ben | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 13% |
| 7 | KUNJAN Lena R. | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 50% | 34% |
| 8 | ROSTAL Scott | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 9 | TAHA Raymond | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | BISSEN Quinn | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% |
| 11 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 12 | SCHROEDER Karl A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 12 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 14 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | OBERLY Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 17 | GLENNON Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | NEAS Derek | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | BURKHARDT Krista | 3% | 19% | 43% | 33% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | DEBLAERE Caecie M. | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | HONEK Kyle | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | TIERNEY Luke | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | READ Lyla | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SIEDOW William | - | 1% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 27 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | EHLERS Justin | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 29 | FRALEY Orion | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | HICKNER Gabe | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | SINGH Sneha | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | GOOD Henry | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SCHULTZ David | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 34 | HAIRSTON Robert | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | STONE Kenneth | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | BENGTSON Jasmine | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KARLSON Taylor | 49% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SLAUGHTER Rowan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | JOHNSON Andrew | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | BUENAFLOR Jeffrey P. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | JOHNSON Alexe | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.