University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YAN William | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
2 | CHIN Matthew W. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | HOTHA Nikhil | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
3 | CORTEZ Christopher | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
5 | CHUNG Connor | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
6 | PATEL Rayn | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | STAMIS Kyle | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
8 | HUANG Zekai | D D V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
9 | CHEN Jonathan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
10 | FELDMAN Drew | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
11 | LIN Felix | V D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
12 | WANG Charles | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
13 | MATT Chris | V D V V V D | V V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
14 | YANG Dylan | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
15 | JENSBY Jason | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
16 | FILATOV Aleksandr | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
17 | MCCARTHY Devan | V V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
18 | JEFFORDS Alexander | V D V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
19 | KLEBS Robert | D V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
20 | JONES Graham H. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
21 | POSY Daniel | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
22 | FERRARA Nicholas S. | V V V D V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
23 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
24 | FERRARO Pietro | D V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
25 | CRAIN Bennett | V D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
26 | FENKER William M. | D V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
27 | DECK Tyson | V D D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
28 | SHANKAR Karthik | D V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
29 | ROBLES Julio C. | V V D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
30 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | D D V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
31 | SZULIM Lucjan | V D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
32 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | D D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
33 | VLASENKO Bohdan | D V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
34 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | D V V D D V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
35 | WANG Max | V V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
36 | VALENCIA Jose | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
37 | BAKER Keith L. | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
38 | VARNER Michael A. | D D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
39 | CLARK Keagan | D V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
40 | STRUCKER Rocco | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
41 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
42 | FENG Brendan | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
43 | LEMERY Marc | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
44 | PARCELL Colby | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
45 | BENSON Jacob | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
46 | REHM Liam | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
47 | MILLS Matthew P. | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
47 | ELDER John | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
49 | HO Alex | V D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
50 | ROSE Colin | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
51 | MISHULOVICH Ronen | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
52 | LICHTERMAN Jakub | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
52 | MILLS Henry | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
54 | ROORDA Easton | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
55 | CAI fungyu | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.