Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Amanda C. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 2 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 3 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
| 5 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 7 | LU Elaine | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 8 | LEE Sophia | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 5% |
| 9 | SINHA Anika | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
| 10 | YU Melinda | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 21% |
| 11 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% |
| 12 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
| 13 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 14 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 15 | HILD Nisha | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
| 16 | WU Helen | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 18 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 19 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 20 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 21 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 38% |
| 22 | JAVERI Amaya | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 23 | MCKEE Ainsley | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
| 25 | KOUROUSI ANNA KALLIOPI | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 26 | SHI Cathleen | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 27 | KIM Marley I. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 28 | PASHIN Anna | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 29 | HUANG Caroline | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 30 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 31 | JACOBS Skye | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | FEIG Sela | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 34 | NATH Trisha | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | SHEN Jamie | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | MAKLIN Sofia | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | NAYAK Esha | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | MCKEE Brynnley | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | MARYASH Samantha | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | FESTA Carina | 3% | 39% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | LI Sophie | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | NAYAK Anika | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 39% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | XIAO julie | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | TSUI Natalie | - | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 49 | YAN Lena | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SO Catelyn | < 1% | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 52 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | WU Yuwei | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 34% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | NAZAROVA Arai | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | SHAH Aanika A. | 9% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | WILDMAN Nora | 6% | 50% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 58 | PILAT Izabela | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.