Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 2 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 3 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
| 5 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 7 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 8 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | 5% |
| 9 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% |
| 10 | YU Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 21% |
| 11 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% |
| 12 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 8% |
| 13 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 14 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 15 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 16 | WU Helen | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 18 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 19 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
| 20 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 21 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
| 22 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 23 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 24 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% |
| 25 | KOUROUSI ANNA KALLIOPI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 26 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 28 | PASHIN Anna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 29 | HUANG Caroline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
| 30 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 31 | JACOBS Skye | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 34 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | SHEN Jamie | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 97% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | LI Sophie | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | XIAO julie | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 49 | YAN Lena | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 52 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | WU Yuwei | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | NAZAROVA Arai | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | SHAH Aanika A. | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | WILDMAN Nora | 100% | 94% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 58 | PILAT Izabela | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.