Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | V V V V D | V V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 2 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | V D V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | CRAPNELL Daniel | V D V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 3 | BRENNEMAN Adam | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 5 | VAN DYK Mark | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 6 | MACNEIL Matthew | V V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | GUILFORD Corey | V V D V V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 8 | STAUBITZ Marc | D V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 9 | MACNEIL Sydney | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 10 | PLUMMER Ken | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 11 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 12 | WANG Ellie | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 13 | SCHROEDER Abigail | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.