Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | |
| 2 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 3 | CRAPNELL Daniel | - | 10% | 48% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 3 | BRENNEMAN Adam | - | 7% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
| 5 | VAN DYK Mark | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 6 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | GUILFORD Corey | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 8 | STAUBITZ Marc | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | MACNEIL Sydney | 26% | 69% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 10 | PLUMMER Ken | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 11 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 5% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 12 | WANG Ellie | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 13 | SCHROEDER Abigail | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.