Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | |
| 2 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 34% |
| 3 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 49% |
| 3 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
| 5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 6 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 49% |
| 7 | BARMAKOV Bogdan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 8 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 9 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 21% | |
| 10 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 11 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 25% |
| 12 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 54% | |
| 13 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 7% | |
| 14 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% | |
| 15 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 17 | FENG Michael | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 18 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | |
| 19 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 31% | |
| 20 | KENNEDY christo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 8% | |
| 22 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 7% | |
| 23 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
| 25 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 2% |
| 26 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 27 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 96% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | CHA James | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | MUNDAHL Brandon | 100% | 93% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | WANG Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
| 31 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 32 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 36 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 5% | - |
| 37 | MURPHY Damian J. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 39 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 85% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% | |
| 41 | HUNTER Phillip | 100% | 81% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
| 42 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 43 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 96% | 69% | 21% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 45 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | SABATINO Patrick | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | AMRANI David | 100% | 81% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 48 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GRANADOS Luis | 100% | 95% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CRUZ ZURITA Leonardo | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 54 | LINDEMANN Marc | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 97% | 64% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | NADOL Sam | 100% | 80% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | CRESSER Matthew | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.