Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 43% | ||
| 2 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | |
| 3 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
| 5 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 5 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 7 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
| 8 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | |
| 9 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 10 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 11 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 12 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
| 12 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 5% | |
| 14 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 36% | ||
| 15 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 16 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 11% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% |
| 18 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
| 19 | JIN Andy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 21 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 22 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 3% | |
| 23 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 27 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% | |
| 28 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 30 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 1% | |
| 31 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 94% | 60% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 32 | REN Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 1% | |
| 34 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 35 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 37 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 83% | 33% | 4% | - | ||
| 38 | WANG Luke | 100% | 97% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | XU Nathan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 41 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 43 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 45 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 93% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | YANG David H. | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 50 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 52 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 53 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | JIN Xueyuan George | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LINDEMANN Conrad | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | JOHN Meru | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 57 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 49% | 9% | - | - | ||
| 58 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 59 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 61 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.