Central Community Center Rink - Mount Prospect, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 2 | EDWARDS Ethan S. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 3 | NOWAK Jakub P. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 5 | WOZNIAK David | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 6 | SYED Saif M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 2% | |
| 7 | LENDER David | - | 2% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 8 | LENTINE Henry | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 9 | MADISON Ethan S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 15% |
| 10 | CONKLIN Jim | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 11 | WOZNIAK Sebastian | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 12 | GUINAN Joseph | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 13 | KAISH Jeremy H. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 14 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 15 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | |
| 16 | SZPAK Lara K. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 17 | OH Matthew M. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 18 | ZEKO David J. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 19 | PONTICELLI Jared M. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
| 20 | OH Kevin Y. | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 21 | SCHRANK Mitchell | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | TOPAZ Nicholas | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 23 | BRENNAN Charles F. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | STENCEL Andrew E. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 25 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 11% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 27 | PICK Ian | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 28 | SCHULTZ Douglas B. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | BURN Lauren M. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | ZUBECK Dominic | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | SILVERS Noah E. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 28% | |
| 32 | NORCONK Claire R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 33 | OCHS Bradley C. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 34 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | 15% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 35 | SCHULTZ Rowan | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | LOMBARD Ella | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | ARTHUR Theodore W. | 10% | 51% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | BYNAGARI Niketh | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | KIM Erika S. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | SWANSON Dave | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 42 | CANCELO Jose | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | OH Kaitlin Y. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ZIRKLE James | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | PATEL Neal | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | TIERNEY Luke | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 47 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 8% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | BYNAGARI Prateek | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | RAZA Nadia A. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BALDWIN Robert (Bob) C. | 18% | 69% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | PONTICELLI Samuel | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | EITZEN Carissa | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | OLEDZKA Julia | 28% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | COHA Richard A. | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.