Central Community Center Rink - Mount Prospect, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
2 | EDWARDS Ethan S. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
3 | NOWAK Jakub P. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
3 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
5 | WOZNIAK David | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
6 | SYED Saif M. | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
7 | LENDER David | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
8 | LENTINE Henry | V D V V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
9 | MADISON Ethan S. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
10 | CONKLIN Jim | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
11 | WOZNIAK Sebastian | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
12 | GUINAN Joseph | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | KAISH Jeremy H. | D V V D V V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
14 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | D V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
15 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | D V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
16 | SZPAK Lara K. | V V D D D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
17 | OH Matthew M. | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | ZEKO David J. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | PONTICELLI Jared M. | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | OH Kevin Y. | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
21 | SCHRANK Mitchell | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
22 | TOPAZ Nicholas | D V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
23 | BRENNAN Charles F. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
24 | STENCEL Andrew E. | V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
25 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
26 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
27 | PICK Ian | V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
28 | SCHULTZ Douglas B. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
29 | BURN Lauren M. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
30 | ZUBECK Dominic | V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
31 | SILVERS Noah E. | V V D D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
32 | NORCONK Claire R. | V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | OCHS Bradley C. | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
34 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | D V V D V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
35 | SCHULTZ Rowan | D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
36 | LOMBARD Ella | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
37 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | ARTHUR Theodore W. | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
39 | BYNAGARI Niketh | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
40 | KIM Erika S. | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
41 | SWANSON Dave | D D D V D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
42 | CANCELO Jose | V D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
43 | OH Kaitlin Y. | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
44 | ZIRKLE James | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
45 | PATEL Neal | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
46 | TIERNEY Luke | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
47 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
49 | BYNAGARI Prateek | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
50 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
51 | RAZA Nadia A. | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
52 | BALDWIN Robert (Bob) C. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
53 | PONTICELLI Samuel | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
54 | EITZEN Carissa | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
55 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
56 | OLEDZKA Julia | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
57 | COHA Richard A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.