Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | ZENG Rick | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% |
| 3 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 3 | ZHANG GAVIN J | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
| 5 | LU Jingyi | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 6 | ZHANG Hanru | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
| 7 | WONG Jacob W. | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
| 8 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 9 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 10 | DIAZ Gabriel | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 11 | LEE Charles T | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 12 | ZHENG Austin | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 13 | BELCHAMBER Mason | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | MO Ethan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
| 15 | HART-SYED declan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 16 | COSSROW Alex | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | HARRA Alexander | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
| 18 | HOU Gaven | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 19 | SHANNON Jack | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% |
| 20 | XU Nathan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 21 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CAO Justin | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 23 | SHAW Spencer | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | QIAN Zekai | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 25 | XIE Jicheng | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 26 | CHUN Zachary | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | JIN Andy | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 28 | BAKSHI Aman | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | TANG Royce | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | BAGRINTSEV Nicholas | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | CHA James | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 33 | WANG Ancen | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | CHEN kenneth | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 35 | CHANG Parker | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 36 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 38 | GRUNENWALD Henri | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Julian | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHOI Hunter | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | WANG Luke | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | REN Ryan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 43 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 1% | 11% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 44 | MA Matthew | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 45 | CHUN Alexander | 32% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | LEE Thomas | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 47 | JABLOKOV Roman | 18% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | LI Jayden | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | KIM Daniel | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | BEYDOUN Sam | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 52 | WEISS Jonah | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | HU Daniel | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | JOHN Meru | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | KRZYWON Dylan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | NOVIKOV Yann | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | ULYSSE Jacob | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | HUANG Jinyao | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 59 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | OH Joshua | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 61 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 62 | LIN Qianzhong | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | ZHENG Christopher | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | KAYE Ben | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LEE Aeden | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | ZHANG Ethan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | BRAIZINHA David | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | WANG Joshua | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | ZHANG Ethan | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 70 | SCHWERDT Jameson | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | LIU Ryan | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 73 | WALDROOP Cuin | 9% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 74 | HERBST Ari | 4% | 25% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | PITERBARG Lev | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 76 | SINCAVAGE Louis | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.